tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11714522.post8890306670495692515..comments2024-03-27T09:11:00.450-04:00Comments on Incinerating Presuppositionalism: Twerking for JesusBahnsen Burnerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11030029491768748360noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11714522.post-91014949624851813182013-11-01T11:36:43.543-04:002013-11-01T11:36:43.543-04:00Completely off topic to this post, but check this ...Completely off topic to this post, but check this article out. Who needs gods when men can do the trick?<br /><br />http://ca.news.yahoo.com/indias-modi-aims-history-gandhis-worlds-tallest-statue-090452150.html<br /><br />In Humanity,<br />DanielAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08459235385224111176noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11714522.post-22425983514099425402013-10-31T12:39:53.334-04:002013-10-31T12:39:53.334-04:00... it requires one to come to the argument with s...<b>... it requires one to come to the argument with some theory of values already in mind.</b> <br /><br />Exactly. The Christian will then turn around and claim that their values come from their god. <br /><br />The ontological argument is so riddled with holes, see Kant, that it's surprising that apologists still use it. NALhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12244370945682162312noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11714522.post-11950979570119886122013-10-31T11:56:12.284-04:002013-10-31T11:56:12.284-04:00Still reading through this and checking sources bu...Still reading through this and checking sources but I can say that all they appear to have done is shown the argument is valid. That does not mean it is automatically sound. Also as they say, acceptance of the premises is a human affair. Justin Hallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17804641315202800289noreply@blogger.com