Blog Chronology

▼

Important Stops

▼
Showing posts with label Subjectivism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Subjectivism. Show all posts
Sunday, June 25, 2023

Frank Turek vs. the Laws of Nature

›
Recently I saw a brief video on Youtube of Christian apologist Frank Turek interrogating someone who appears to be a student in some kind o...
22 comments:
Sunday, March 08, 2020

WSIBC: "God and Morality"

›
In the section titled “God and Morality” of the fourth chapter of Why Should I Believe Christianity? (WSIBC), James Anderson offers what h...
2 comments:
Monday, February 17, 2020

WSIBC: "God and Values"

›
I continue now with my examination of James Anderson’s apologetic book Why Should I Believe Christianity? (WSIBC), exploring the second ca...
1 comment:
Sunday, February 02, 2020

WSIBC: “God and Existence” – Part 2: Contingency Desperation

›
In my previous entry I began exploring the first of six cases which Christian apologist James Anderson presents in defense of theism in th...
1 comment:
Friday, December 27, 2019

WSIBC: Divine Voices and Failed Arguments

›
I am continuing to work through James Anderson’s book Why Should I Believe Christianity (WSIBC) and now have well over a hundred pages of ...
2 comments:
Sunday, February 25, 2018

Does Following the Evidence Lead One Over a Cliff?

›
Over on Triablogue , apologist Steve Hays has posted a blog entitled Am I a presuppositionalist? In this entry, Hays runs through a number...
4 comments:
Monday, January 01, 2018

Is the Christian God a "Necessary Being"?

›
Recently Steve Hays over at Triablogue posted a blog entry titled Who Made God? . This entry offers some instructive opportunities for eng...
5 comments:
Wednesday, December 27, 2017

"What would convince you?"

›
Often Christians seeking to defend their religious views will ask non-believers what they would accept as convincing evidence that their go...
2 comments:
Sunday, February 26, 2017

More on Hearing Voices in His Head

›
In this post, I pick up from my previous entry and explore Anderson’s appraisal of the objections that he considers in response to apologe...
5 comments:
Sunday, September 11, 2016

Does One Need Evidence to Be an Atheist?

›
“[A]theism is just a statement of what an atheist doesn't believe rather than what he does believe” – Steve Hays Over on Triablogue...
8 comments:
Sunday, March 13, 2016

Creationism, the Universe, and Imagination

›
Religious apologists have a very limited set of gimmicks to use in defense of their theistic confessions. When more philosophical strategie...
2 comments:
Wednesday, November 11, 2015

W.L. Craig, the Resurrection, and the Complaint of Presuppositional Bias

›
Apologists often presume that they’re scoring significant debating points when in fact they’re only succeeding at multiplying their own bur...
134 comments:
Wednesday, October 07, 2015

Walking on Water vs. Reality

›
A famous passage in the gospel of Matthew goes as follows: And straightway Jesus constrained his disciples to get into a ship, and to g...
8 comments:
Saturday, March 21, 2015

Craig’s Eight Arguments for God, Part VIII: “The very possibility of God’s existence implies that God exists”

›
We now come to William Lane Craig’s seventh argument. This comes from his set of arguments which were published in the Nov/Dec 2013 issue ...
2 comments:
Monday, May 05, 2014

Is the Concept of Evidence Itself Evidence that God Exists?

›
In a podcast hosted by “The Bible-Thumping Wingnut” , professional presuppositionalist grandstander Sye Ten Bruggencate makes the following...
3 comments:
Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Presuppositionalism, Circular Argument, and Oliphant’s Defense

›
Presuppositionalist apologists frequently complain that their critics have misunderstood their apologetic platform when they charge that th...
9 comments:
Sunday, February 02, 2014

A Reply to Matthias on Subjectivism and the Believer

›
This is the sixth and final installment in my interaction with a comment which Matthias McMahon of Choosing Hats posted on my blog Confess...
29 comments:
Thursday, January 30, 2014

A Reply to Matthias on "Analogous Knowledge"

›
I continue now with my reply to Matthias McMahon. In the present installment, I explore some of the premises and implications of the Christ...
12 comments:
Tuesday, January 28, 2014

A Reply to Matthias on Objective Knowledge vs. the Subjectivism of Theism

›
This is the fourth installment of a series of replies I’ve been writing in response to a comment (yes, I know, just one comment) posted on...
4 comments:
Thursday, January 23, 2014

A Reply to Matthias on Holy Inference vs. Reason: How Do We Know What’s Inside the Box?

›
In this post I continue my interaction with Matthias’ comment on my blog Confessions of a Vantillian Subjectivist , a comment that provides...
23 comments: